![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Contrary to popular belief, Americans did not win the revolution through "bush fighting" or anything similar. Also, the accuracy of the average American with a musket was on the same level as a British soldier.
Despite all that, the Americans waged a successful war of attrition. George Washington, when it came to victories, was a terrible general. Where he succeeded the most was pulling a minor defeat out of the jaws of a crushing defeat. Considering that the British goals were
-Defeat the American Army in the field
-Capture George Washington
-Capture the new American leaders
-Prevent foreign intervention
And American goals were
-Outlast the British until they were tired of fighting
-Get foreign support
-Keep an army in the field
It was a perfect way to wage a war of attrition. While Washington may not have been able to deliver the victories, he had an outstanding aptitude towards raising morale, garnering respect, and keeping his command alive.
Despite the history of British military victories, this type of war was new to them. Being used to capturing capital cities to win wars, confusion among Parliament and other British leaders ran rampant when Philadelphia was captured but no sign of American defeat was showing.
Banastre Tarleton had the right idea when it came to fighting Americans. While brutal, it was necessary to wage a terror campaign to break the spirits of those who supported. Unfortunately for the English, he was kept reigned in by his superiors and was delivered a decisive defeat at the Battle of Cowpens, where Daniel Morgan killed/wounded/captured 86% of Tarleton's command.
Despite all that, the Americans waged a successful war of attrition. George Washington, when it came to victories, was a terrible general. Where he succeeded the most was pulling a minor defeat out of the jaws of a crushing defeat. Considering that the British goals were
-Defeat the American Army in the field
-Capture George Washington
-Capture the new American leaders
-Prevent foreign intervention
And American goals were
-Outlast the British until they were tired of fighting
-Get foreign support
-Keep an army in the field
It was a perfect way to wage a war of attrition. While Washington may not have been able to deliver the victories, he had an outstanding aptitude towards raising morale, garnering respect, and keeping his command alive.
Despite the history of British military victories, this type of war was new to them. Being used to capturing capital cities to win wars, confusion among Parliament and other British leaders ran rampant when Philadelphia was captured but no sign of American defeat was showing.
Banastre Tarleton had the right idea when it came to fighting Americans. While brutal, it was necessary to wage a terror campaign to break the spirits of those who supported. Unfortunately for the English, he was kept reigned in by his superiors and was delivered a decisive defeat at the Battle of Cowpens, where Daniel Morgan killed/wounded/captured 86% of Tarleton's command.
no subject
/watched an episode where he sucked off Washington's historical cock for half an hour and was so distracted I forgot to change the channel.
no subject
no subject
no subject
myself and the majority of my IRL friends are mostly conservative (more liberal socially)
and we all hate Fox News programs with a passion.
no subject
You can imagine how awkward this is for us.
no subject
My little brother thinks the same.
Thankfully, I can get away with laughing in his face.
no subject
no subject
Japan got a Nintendo DS and Chrono Trigger.
Patchouli best be preparing herself for classic JRPG action.
no subject
/not complaining
no subject
UNFORTUNATELY, NONE OF THEM ARE 2D.
no subject